ABSTRACT

The paper aims to analyse how Reg. EU n. 511/2014 links the principle of solidarity to one of the most visible areas of intersection between EU law and ethical choice, particularly in the field of research activity: the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in the EU legal framework. A broad range of users and suppliers in the Union, including academic, university and non-commercial researchers and companies from different sectors of industry, use genetic resources for research, development and commercialisation purposes. Some also use traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources [see point 3 Reg (EU) 2014/511]. Thus, all research activities involving germplasm, genetic resources, and traditional knowledge related to genetic resources are currently subject to Article 15, point 6, of the Convention on Biodiversity, and they also must observe the fundamental principle (established by Article 19 of the Convention and EU legal sources) of benefiting the countries involved in the research and development actions. The mutually agreed terms and the contracts mandated by art. 3 reg. EU n. 511/2014 are correlated with distributive justice and the principle of solidarity, which underpin the entire EU legal system.

KEYWORDS

Research Activity
Principe of solidarity
European Union legal framework
Biodiversity

ARTICLE INFO

Rights and Science / R&S
Vol. 0 (2017), Issue 0
43-54

REFERENCES

ACEMOGLU, B. (2010). “Theory, general equilibrium, and political economy in development economics”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24 (3), 17-32.

AMABLE, B. (2003). The diversity of modern capitalism. Oxford.

AMUNDSEN, E. S., BALDURSSON, F. M. & MORTENSEN, J. B. (2003). “Price volatility and banking in green certificate markets”. Working Papers in Economics 02. University of Bergen, Department of Economic.

ARNOLD, R. (2003). Le droit constitutionnel europeen et le rôle des cours de Karlsruhe, de Luxembourg et de Strasbourg. Vrabie (dir.), Institutul European Iasi/Roumanie, 53-62.

ARNOLD, R. (2013). “Protección de los derechos fundamentales (en Europa)”. In M. I. ÁLVAREZ LEDESMA & R. CIPPITANI (coord. by). Diccionario analítico de derechos humanos e integración jurídica. Roma-Perugia-México: ISEG, 563.

BOURGEOIS, L. (1906). Solidarité (5th ed.). Parigi, 10.

CAFAGGI, F. & WATT, H. M. (2008). The regulatory function of European private law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

CIPPITANI, R. (2011). La solidarietà giuridica tra pubblico e privato. Roma-Perugia-Mexico: ISEG.

COLCELLI, V. (2012). “The problem of the legal nature of green certificates in the Italian legal system”. Energy Policy, 40, 301-306.

COLCELLI, V. (2013). “Private law instruments as way of EU regional integration”. In M. I. ÁLVAREZ LEDESMA & R. CIPPITANI (coord. by). Derechos Individuales e Integración regional (antología). Roma-Perugia-México: ISEG, 575-597.

COLCELLI, V. (2015). “The solidarity principle in new EU member states”. In C. PERUGINI & F. POMPEI (eds.). Inequalities during and after trannsition in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke (GBR), 247-265.

DUTFIELD, P. (2005). “Sharing the benefit of biodiversity. Is there a role for the patent system?” In G. P. SAMPSON & J. WHALLEY (eds.). WTO, trade and the environment. Cheltenham, 513.

JOERGES, C. & PETERSMANN, E. U. (2006). Constitutionalism, multilevel trade governance and social regulation. Oxford: Oxford Press.

MARSHALL, T. H. (2002). Cittadinanza e classe sociale. Bari-Roma: La Terza.

MEZZADRA, S. (1995). Costituzionalizzazione del lavoro e stato sociale: l’esperienza weimariana, Ai confini dello Stato sociale. Roma: Manifestolibri.

MONATERI, P. G. (2003). “The weak law: Contaminations and legal cultures”. In TL&CP (Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems), 575.

MORTATI, C. (1946). La Costituzione di Weimar. Firenze: Sansoni.

POSEY, D. A. (1993). Intellectual propriety rights and just compensation for indigenous knowledge, Amazonia and Siberia: Legal aspects of the preservation of the environment and development in the last open spaces. Londra.

SANDBERG, A. (2007). “Property rights and ecosystem properties”. Land Use Policy, 24, 613-623.

SCAGLIONE, F. (2008). “La tutela civile del mercato concorrenziale”. In A. PALAZZO, A. SASSI & F. SCAGLIONE (eds.). Permanenze dell’interpretazione civile. Perugia: ISEG, 189.

STJERNØ, S. (2004). Solidarity in Europe: The history of an idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

VEZZANI, S. (2007). “Il Primo Protocollo alla Convezione europea dei diritti umani e la tutela della proprietà intellettuale di popoli indigeni e comunità locali”. Diritti Umani e Diritto Internazionale, 1, 305-342.